About Me

I am at Florida State College Jacksonville in the Office of Learning Services. I lead the custom learning solutions for our new small business unit Global Education Learning Solutions GLS. I enjoy presenting at various conferences on my work and research interests. Currently I am very interested in mobile e-books, immersive exploratory learning objects, offline synchronizing LMS technologies, and situated cognition. Additionally, I am experimenting with ways immersive virtual environments such as Second Life may be used to support teaching and learning. One fascinating book I recommend for those interested in virtual worlds is Synthetic Worlds by Edward Castronova. Last year I completed a multiple case study exploring student learning experiences with mobile e-books, with a particular focus on situated learning and am interested in the learning applications of social media.....

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Final Grades EEX2010

Students in EEX2010,


Please get your final class team project articles and classroom journals posted by 10/23.  This will allow the class the time to then post comments and questions for each, which is part of your overall grade.


Also, please make sure you have posted in the weekly discussions and taken your exams online.  I will leave the class open until 10/26 for the discussions, however your journal articles and classroom observations need to be posted by 10/23.


Email me directly with questions, Thank you. 

Dr  Kissinger

Friday, October 14, 2011

EEX2010 Course Ends 10/23/11

Hello Students in EEX2010,

Please make sure you get all your assignments in as we have approximately two weeks left in this class.  In the discussion post at least 3 or 4 times, get your articles posted for the class team project, and of course take the exams online.   Please email me with any questions. 

Thanks again,

Dr Kissinger

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

EEX4201 Literature Review- How to do very well...


How to get a great grade on your literature review:  

Students, nothing seems to be more helpful than a nice, high quality example.  Regarding your lit reviews, please see this example below from a former student that received full credit.  Notice that the articles come from peer-reviewed professional journals that are on research.  These are the types of sources you are looking for, not newspaper stories, etc.  Please email me if you have further questions. 

-Dr. Kissinger

Final Exam/ Literature Review


My topic for this Literature Review was Special Education in schools.

Article 1
I. Bibliographic data: Kearns, J.F., Towles-Reeves, E., Kleinert, H.L, Kleinert, J. O, & Thomas, M.K-K. (2009). Characteristics of and Implications for Students Participating in Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Academic Achievement Standards. Hammiel Institute on Disabilities, 312.

II. Type of article: Journal

III. Topic of article: Alternative assessment for special education

IV. Summary:
  •  Little research has precisely defined the population of students participating in alternate assessments based on alternate academic achievement standards.
  • The purpose of this article is for two reasons: 1. Explicate the findings of a multistate study examining the characteristics of the population of students participating in the AA-AAAS, and 2. Discuss the implications of those findings for instruction and assessment that move us closer to understanding what these students know and can do
  • This article discusses the results of the study that was conducted within and across seven states
V. Educational implications: There may be new rules and regulations in schools regarding how those in the school assess special education students in the alternative assessments that are given to them. A study was done to see how the special education students are doing in these alternative assessments and to see what could be done to improve test scores in these areas.

VI. Critique of article:
First off, I found the article kind of hard to read, but that is to be expected since I am not used to reading these types of articles or journals. I thought this journal article interesting and look forward to knowing whether new implications are going to be added to the schools. It is kind of sad to know though that even though we give special education students alternative assessments they are still failing at them. What is to be done?



Article 2
I. Bibliographic data: Lee, Y., Wehmeyer, M.L., Palmer, S.B., Williams-Diehm, K., Davies, D.K., & Stock, S.E. (2011). The Effect of Student-Directed Transition Planning With a Computer-Based Reading Support Program on the Self-Determination of Students with Disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 104-177.

II. Type of article: Journal

III. Topic of article: Assessment results of special education students

IV. Summary:
  •  The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of student-directed transition planning instruction (Whose Future Is It Anyway? curriculum) with a computer-based reading support program (Rocket Reader) on the self-determination, self-efficacy and outcome expectancy, and transition planning knowledge of students with disabilities.
  • This study employed a pre- and post measure design with 168 middle school students with disabilities who were assigned to an experimental group (n = 86) and control group (n = 82).
  • The results of the study demonstrated that self-determination, self-efficacy, and outcome expectancy for education planning improved through the application of Rocket Reader.
  • Avenues are discussed for promoting middle school students’ self-determination in their transition planning, as are implications for future research.
V. Educational implications: The educational implications for this article are they if we as parents and teachers allow students to decide their own future or outcomes in life on their own terms, especially special education students, instead of forcing students to learn on our terms when we force information down their throats. It is basically offering a new example of teaching and learning results.

VI. Critique of article:
I can honestly say that I was not surprised by this article. I have known for a while that it is really easy to motivate a child when you let them set the terms and you use things that interest them. My son has ADHD and we have found that he can learn anything on the computer but if we try to make him learn on a sheet of paper he wants nothing to do with it. I look forward to see how this study affects schools and such and how much the teaching system will change if more studies like this are done in the near future.





Article 3
I. Bibliographic data: Mechling, L. C., & Bischop, V.A. (2009). Assessment of Computer-Based Preferences of Students with Profound Multiple Disabilities. Sage Publications.

II. Type of article: Journal

III. Topic of article: Alternative teaching methods for students with PMD

IV. Summary:
  •  This article reports on two studies investigating the use of computer-based motivation that may then be used to develop activities and programming for students with profound multiple disabilities (PMD).
  • Both studies used an alternating treatments design and systematic assessment strategy to present motivation sequentially and to measure student responses to the varying computer-based motivation
  • Study 1 compared student preferences for computer-based motivation, which were then used in Study 2 to compare student preferences for motivation presented on a traditional computer-based system and a large interactive whiteboard.
  • Results support use of computer-based motivation that may be used in the development and implementation of educational programs for students with PMD.
V. Educational implications: Based off the two studies done, it seems that special education students with profound multiple disabilities (PMD) work best with computer-based motivation. There may be a time that all teaching is done with computer-based motivations or just computers period.

VI. Critique of article:
I really liked this article. I look forward to future posting by these authors. I have felt for a while that computers were going to take over the classrooms but this article confirms it. It was really interesting to read the studies done and to see how they performed them.













Article 4
I. Bibliographic data: Kretlow, A.G. (2011). Using In-Service and Coaching to Increase Kindergarten Teachers’ Accurate Delivery of Group Instructional Units. Journal of Special Education, 234-246.

II. Type of article: Journal

III. Topic of article: Early Intervention

IV. Summary:
  •  Early intervention is key to preventing academic failure and referral to special education.
  • General educators are responsible for providing primary instruction for students at risk for failure; however, the training they receive related to specific instructional strategies for these students is often insufficient.
  • Alternative forms of professional development that include a combination of in-service and follow-up support have shown more promise in promoting changes in teaching behaviors.
  • This study examined the effects of in-service support plus caching on kindergarten teachers’ accurate delivery of group instructional units in math.
  • Teachers were trained to use a combination of whole-class instruction strategies, including model-lead-test for introducing new concepts and correcting errors, choral responding, and response cards.
  • Results indicated that all teachers improved their delivery of instruction after the in-service training, with a second level of growth achieved after coaching.
  • Teachers also reported high levels of satisfaction using the strategies.
V. Educational implications: It seems that this has already had educational implications. This article seemed to sum up a lot of what my introduction to teaching class was.

VI. Critique of article:
I found this article interesting. It seemed to reintroduce to me a lot of information that I had in other classes and proved a lot of my thoughts and opinions right. This was an interesting study to read and I look forward to future studies by these authors.







Article 5
I. Bibliographic data: Wasburn-Moses, L. (2011). An Investigation of Alternative Schools in One State: Implications for Students with Disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 247-255.

II. Type of article: Journal

III. Topic of article: New school ideas for special education students

IV. Summary:
  •  Despite the continued growth of inclusive practices, an increasing number of students with disabilities are being served in alternative school settings.
  • The number of students served in these settings, and the services they are receiving, remains virtually unexplored.
  • This study reports the results of a survey of alternative schools in one Midwestern state.
  • Particular attention was paid to the participation of students with disabilities in these settings and the services they are receiving.
  • Results indicated that, despite access to valuable supports and services, some students with disabilities placed in alternative settings may be experiencing significant service gaps.
  • Of serious concern is the placement of students who have committed criminal offenses.
  • Implications include a pressing need for data collection and increased advocacy.
V. Educational implications: There may be a new way of approaching or teaching special education students. The fact that even though they are in a school of their own, they still are not getting the care or instruction that they need. New regulations will have to be made.

VI. Critique of article:
I found it kind of sad to know that these students were not being attended to in the manner that they should have. I don’t want to say I enjoyed the article, because it was a sad article, but at the same time I feel more knowledgeable having read it. I look forward to seeing how this situation plays out and what other studies are done on this group.







Article 6
I. Bibliographic data: Kurz, A., Elliott, S.N., Wehby, J.H., & Smithson, J.L. (2010). Alignment of the Intended, Planned, and Enacted Curriculum in General and Special Education and Its Relation to the Student Achievement. Journal of Special Education, 131-145.

II. Type of article: Journal

III. Topic of article: General curriculum in special education

IV. Summary:
  •  In this study, the authors examined the content of the planned and enacted eighth-grade mathematics curriculum for 18 general and special education teachers and the curricula’s alignment to state standards via the Surveys of the Enacted Curriculum.
  • The relation between alignment and student achievement was analyzed for three formative assessments and the corresponding state test within a school year.
  • Results indicated that alignment for the planned and enacted curriculum to state standards was low with no significant differences between general and special education teachers.
  • Significant correlations between student achievement averages for 238 students and teacher alignment indices were equal to or greater than .48.
  • When teacher groups were examined separately, the relation between alignment and achievement remained significant only for special education, with correlations equal to or greater than .75.
  • The study’s conceptual and methodological framework provides a model for subsequent research on alignment and opportunity to learn in general and special education.
V. Educational implications: This study shows that what we want or expect out of our curriculum for our students and their results is not what we are getting. The educational implications for this study are that we as teachers need to assess and reassess constantly with our students until we can get the right dosage of instruction to result for the group.

VI. Critique of article:
I found this article to be quite interesting. I have known for years that as a teacher you assess and reassess constantly, this study just proves me right. I look forward to seeing how this study might change how a curriculum is given to the students. I found, when I did some of my internship in high school teaching middle school students, that if one the first day I asked the students what they expected to learn out of the class and then asked to add a few extra things that everyone passed because they knew what to expect from the class and it was on their terms. When I was in school we had to do mission statements and a lot of my teachers put in the syllabus with the mission statement and everyone in the class had to sign to this agreement and was held to it and when this happened there were no problems with the class or assignments.

Article 7
I. Bibliographic data: Ault, M.J. (2010). Inclusion of Religion and Spirituality in the Special Education Literature. Journal of Special Education, 176-189.

II. Type of article: Journal

III. Topic of article: Religion in special education

IV. Summary:
  •  Although traditionally not an area of service delivered by special educators, the area of religion and spirituality for persons with disabilities is receiving more attention as a quality-of-life outcome.
  • This article examined the special education literature to determine the extent to which special educators are exposed to literature concerned with these issues.
  • The results indicated that information is found in the literature but occurs most often as embedded references in articles on other topics.
  •  Information was most often included in articles focusing on diversity, and the majority of references to religion and spirituality were descriptions of religions.
  • Religion and spirituality are linked to the overarching goals of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 and quality-of-life outcomes.
  •  Future research and roles for professionals are discussed.
V. Educational implications: The educational implications in this article are such that we might expect to see more religious literature in schools, especially in the areas of special education.

VI. Critique of article: I found this article interesting. I for one do not want religion in schools. I myself am Pagan and am raising my son to be a very open minded individual and am letting him make his own choices about religion as he grows and do not want the schools to tell my son which is the right religion and which is the wrong. If they were to teach all religions in school then that is fine but I know for a fact they would not and think this is wrong. I understand for some special needs students this is a must or a need for quality of life but it should be down as a homeschooling not in public schools.






Article 8
I. Bibliographic data: Swinehart-Jones, D., & Wolff Heller, K. (2009). Teaching Students with Severe Speech and Physical Impairments a Decoding Strategy Using Internal Speech and Motoric Indicators. Journal of Special Education, 131-144.

II. Type of article: Journal

III. Topic of article: New approach to speech and physical impairments in schools

IV. Summary:
  •  Children who have severe speech and physical impairments often have difficulty acquiring literacy skills.
  • One critical area of literacy instruction involves promoting word identification though the development of decoding strategies that can be implemented by students independently.
  • This study investigated teaching four students who have cerebral palsy and dysarthric speech to internalize the three-step decoding strategy found in the Nonverbal Reading Approach, as demonstrated by motoric indicators (individualized motor movements that parallel the decoding steps).
  • The results of this study indicate that students are able to learn the three-step decoding strategy with the addition of a motoric indicator to identify words in isolation, as well as to apply the strategy independently upon encountering unknown words in connected text.
V. Educational implications: The educational implications of this article is that there is a new or old way redone to help students with severe speech and physical impairments to have better literacy skills. This may change how we approach certain students.

VI. Critique of article:
I found this article interesting. My sister has cerebral palsy and I know that she has a difficult time with her literacy skills, they are no better than a 5 years old. I am interested to find out if this will help her at all and have forwarded this article on to my mother. I am also looking forward to see how this will be implemented into schools and when or how we as teachers will be taught this method to help some of our students.







Article 9
I. Bibliographic data: Fiedler, C.R., & Van Haren, B. (2009) A Comparison of Special Education Admistrators’ and Teachers’ Knowledge and Application of Ethics and Professional Standards. Journal of Special Education, 160-173.

II. Type of article: Journal

III. Topic of article: Ethics and standards in special education among staff

IV. Summary:
  •  The field of special education is wrought with ethical dilemmas.
  • The Council for Exceptional Children has outlined its code of ethics and standards for professional practice for individuals working in the field of special education.
  •  The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which special education administrators and teachers possess similar or different levels of knowledge and application of the council’s code and the professional advocacy responsibilities enunciated in the standards.
  •  A survey was administered to 624 professionals in the state of Wisconsin who worked with students with disabilities: 99 special education administrators and 525 special education teachers.
  •  Special education administrators and teachers were asked to rate their knowledge level of the council’s code and standards and how they used the standards when faced with ethical dilemmas.
V. Educational implications: The educational implications are somewhat already in order; they may just be improved upon.

VI. Critique of article:
I found this article to be somewhat disturbing. The fact that we needed a study like this and the results is the most disturbing of it all. I will admit I am looking forward to the next round of this study to make sure that the problems have been cleared up.








Article 10
I. Bibliographic data: Suter, J.C., & Giangreco, M.F. (2009). Numbers that Count: Exploring Special Education and Paraprofessional Service Delivery in Inclusion-Oriented Schools. Journal of Special Education, 81-93.

II. Type of article: Journal

III. Topic of article: Paraprofessionals in special education

IV. Summary:
  •  This study explores key indicators of special education service delivery based on responses from 92 special educators and 36 administrators in 19 Vermont schools.
  • Special educators reported on their work, the work of paraprofessionals they supervised, and 103 students with disabilities who were receiving one-to-one paraprofessional supports within general education classes.
  •  Findings indicate that (a) many special educators have large caseloads; (b) there are substantially more paraprofessionals than special educators, and (c) more than half of all special education paraprofessionals are assigned to students with disabilities one-to-one.
  • Combined, these factors indicate that schools employed models of service delivery for students with disabilities that are substantially supported by paraprofessionals, thus raising concerns about students' access to a free, appropriate public education.
V. Educational implications: The educational implications of this article might be that a lot of paraprofessionals might lose their jobs if they don’t become fully certified teachers within a period of time. Also that a lot of students are spending more time with a paraprofessional than an actual teacher which is not appropriate.

VI. Critique of article:
I found this article to be a little odd. I have looked into Vermont schools in the past and did not know that this many paraprofessionals were in the schools, at least they don’t put that out there for people to know. I am kind of mixed on this article though, because one I don’t think the students should be with paraprofessionals for this long but at the same time at least they are getting some type of one-on-one treatment.






Article 11
I. Bibliographic data: Stang, K. K., Carter, E.W., Lane, K.L., & Pierson, M.R. (2009). Perspectives of General and Special Educators on Fostering Self-Determination in Elementary and Middle Schools. Journal of Special Education, 94-106.

II. Type of article: Journal

III. Topic of article: Self-determination in schools among special education

IV. Summary:
  •  Recognizing that many youth with disabilities lack critical self-determination skills and that such deficits may be a contributing factor to disappointing post school outcomes, educators and researchers have called for increased attention to promoting student self-determination in the early grades.
  • The authors queried 891 elementary and middle school teachers regarding the extent to which they valued and provided instruction in seven self-determination skill domains.
  • Educators generally perceived self-determination to be an important curricular priority, and the majority reported teaching self-determination skills at least sometimes in their classrooms.
  • Special educators' ratings of overall importance were significantly higher than those of general educators.
  • Middle school teachers reported providing self-determination instruction more frequently than elementary school teachers.
  • These findings lend additional support to calls for promoting self-determination within the general curriculum in the earlier grades.
V. Educational implications: The education implications of this article are that we as educator might be called upon more frequently to teach our students self-determination skills and at an earlier age.

VI. Critique of article:
I found this article a little disturbing. I have taught my son from an early age self-determination and self-reliance and to know that many schools are not teaching him these same skills is kind of sad. I as a teacher am going to use this article to remind myself to keep teaching my students more than just basic information in a classroom and to teach them skills that they can use elsewhere in life or the world.





Article 12
I. Bibliographic data: Al Otaiba, S., Puranik, C.S., Ziolkowski, R.A., & Montgomery, T.M. (2009). Effectiveness of Early Phonological Awareness Interventions for Students with Speech or Language Impairments. Journal of Special Education, 107-128.

II. Type of article: Journal

III. Topic of article: Defining and diagnosing a disability

IV. Summary:
  •  This article reviews research examining the efficacy of early phonological interventions for young students identified with speech and language impairments.
  • Eighteen studies are included, providing results for nearly 500 students in preschool through third grade.
  • Although findings are generally positive, there are large individual differences in response to intervention.
  • Furthermore, there is little evidence that interventions enabled students to catch up to typically developing peers in phonological and reading skills.
  • Methodological issues are described, and implications for practice and future research are discussed.
V. Educational implications: The education implications of this article are that maybe early phonological inventions are not doing the purpose they were set out to do. We as educators might need to revamp how we do interventions and how those interventions are executed.

VI. Critique of article:
I will admit I was interested by this article. I thought that one an intervention had been done and was being executed that the problems were solved and seeing this and now finding that even when an intervention is going on it could be wrong. This is just surprising and I hope they find an answer to this study soon.








Article 13
I. Bibliographic data: Lo, Y-y., Wang, C., & Haskell, S. (2009). Examining the Impacts of Early Reading Intervention on the Growth Rates in Basic Literacy Skills of At-Risk Urban Kindergarteners. Journal of Special Education, 12-28.

II. Type of article: Journal

III. Topic of article: Early literacy rates

IV. Summary:
  •  This study investigated the effects of the Scott Foresman Early Reading Intervention (ERI) on growth rates in the early literacy skills of urban at-risk kindergarten students.
  • Students participated in one of three groups: treatment-intensive/ strategic, treatment-benchmark, and nontreatment-benchmark.
  • Treatment group students received a 30-minute ERI program from classroom teachers 3 days a week for 5 to 14 weeks.
  • Using multivariate analysis of variance and the hierarchical linear model, the authors compared students' benchmark and progress monitoring scores on the Phoneme Segmentation Fluency (PSF) and Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF) subtests of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Literacy Skills.
  • Results indicated that PSF and NWF benchmark performance gaps decreased between the treatment-intensive/ strategic and nontreatment-benchmark groups, indicating beneficial effects for the ERI.
  • Additionally, the PSF and NWF progress monitoring growth rates of treatment group students during the ERI program were significantly higher than rates before treatment.
  • Implications of early reading interventions for urban at-risk students are discussed.
V. Educational implications: The educational implications of this article are that this new type of curriculum for kindergarteners works and might be implicated into many other school systems.

VI. Critique of article:
I found this article interesting. I am wondering how many other studies like this has been done and how quickly all of this will be implemented into local school systems. I have seen other studies like this before and there is something similar to this in my son’s school and I wonder if it is based off a study like this. Very interesting!





Article 14
I. Bibliographic data: Lee, S.-H., Soukup, J.H., Little, T.D., & Wehmeyer, M.L. (2009). Student and Teacher Variables Contributing to Access to the General Education Curriculum for Students with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 29-44.

II. Type of article: Journal

III. Topic of article: Access to general education curriculum

IV. Summary:
  •  The predictors of student and teacher variables on the access to the general education curriculum of 19 students with intellectual and developmental disabilities were examined based on the observation data collected for a total of 1,140 minutes.
  • Multilevel regression analyses were employed to analyze the data.
  • The findings indicated that both student and teacher variables are strong predictors of access to the general education curriculum.
  •  A complicated pattern of the relationship between student and teacher variables (e.g., suppression, correction of distortion) was found along with interaction between these variables and environmental factors.
  • These findings also suggest future practices and research that can be considered to enhance access to the general education curriculum for students with disabilities.
V. Educational implications: The educational implications of this article are a new approach to students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. We as educators may see a new way of approaching these students.

VI. Critique of article:
I found this article interesting. My sister has cerebral palsy and I know that she has a difficult time with school because of her disabilities, they are no better than a 5 years old. I am interested to find out if this will help her at all and have forwarded this article on to my mother. I am also looking forward to see how this will be implemented into schools and when or how we as teachers will be taught this method to help some of our students.







Article 15
I. Bibliographic data: Duquette, P.J., Hooper, S.R., Icard, P.F., Hower, S.J., Mamak, E.G., Wetherinton, C.E., et al. (2009). Neurodevelopmental Status and Adaptive Behaviors in Preschool Children with Chronic Kidney Disease. Journal of Special Education, 45-51.

II. Type of article: Journal

III. Topic of article: Kidney failure and special education

IV. Summary:
  •  This study examines the early neurodevelopmental function of infants and preschool children who have chronic kidney disease (CKD).
  • Fifteen patients with CKD are compared to a healthy control group using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (VABS).
  • Multivariate analysis reveals significant differences between the CKD and control groups on both MSEL (p < .01) and VABS (p < .001) composite scales, with the group with CKD obtaining lower scores on both composites.
  •  A higher proportion of children with CKD meet federal eligibility criteria for early cognitive delay, but similar proportions are found across adaptive behaviors.
  • Disease severity is positively correlated to cognitive and adaptive functioning such that lower scores are associated with less renal function (MSEL r = .62, p < .001; VABS r = .70, p < .001).
  • Suggestions are made in regard to special education assessment and service provision.
V. Educational implications: The educational implications of this article are that as preschool teachers we may have to take a different approach to students with CKD. These children fall into a category all of their own and new standards and curriculums will have to be developed for them.

VI. Critique of article:
I will admit that I found this article hard to read. I had to get my mother to sit down with me and help me understand it but after reading and understanding it I found it kind of sad. To know that one problem can lead into so many other problems and that to solve that one problem does not solve all the other problems is a hard one as both a parent and an educator.





Article 16
I. Bibliographic data: Stinson, M.S., Elliot, L.B., Kelly, R.R., & Liu, Y. (2009). Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students’ Memory of Lectures with Speech-to-Text and Interpreting/Note Taking Services. Journal of Special Education, 52-64.

II. Type of article: Journal

III. Topic of article: Hearing impairments and deafness

IV. Summary:
  • In one investigation with 48 deaf and hard-of-hearing (hh) high school students and a second investigation with 48 deaf/hh college students, all viewed one lecture with an interpreter and one with the C-Print speech-to-text support service.
  • High school students retained more lecture information when they viewed speech-to-text support, compared to interpreter support, and when they studied note taker notes or a hard copy of the text after viewing the lecture, compared to no opportunity to study.
  •  For college students, however, there was no difference between retention with these two kinds of support or with study of notes, compared to no study.
  • For the college investigation, there was a three-way interaction due to markedly better performance on a multiple-choice than on a sentence-completion test when students viewed an interpreter and did not study notes.
  • This result may have reflected difficulty in comprehending unfamiliar terms. Reading proficiency was also related to retention
V. Educational implications: The educational implications of this article are that we need to approach audio impaired students differently. This study showed possibly how we might want to approach these students.

VI. Critique of article:
I found this article interesting to read. I was originally going to teach at the Florida School for the Deaf and Blind when I was a teenager and won a scholarship but unfortunately family circumstances changed and I lost my scholarship due to moving but I am still very interested in this disability. To know that retention rates were higher for some things and not others is interesting as well.

Monday, October 10, 2011

1. Fall2011-EEX4201-Yng Chld W/spec Need-354164

Update: I have graded assignments through 4 and discussion through 4, overall great job.  Also I have graded both article reviews, and these were mostly very impressive.  I enjoyed the diversity of research interests.  As you plan for your literature reviews where you will be reviewing 10 or more research articles please continue with this great work!!!  I am truly enjoying reading your comments and how this helps inform us as educators....  Keep it going.  

I have also given the entire class extra points on quiz 5, so no need to email me about that.  Thanks, lets continue the great momentum and end this course with a bang.  :)  Dr. Kissinger

EEX2010 Update

Hello 2010 students,

There have been some very detailed discussion posts, and in particular I have enjoyed the litigation comments.  Wonderful job.

Regarding the service learning visits please email me and let me know if you are ready for me to grade your work.  Do the same thing for the class team project. Remember that part of your grade is to share and discuss with the class regarding these assignments, so post, post, post!

Dr Kissinger